The role of a reward function has even more importance during a recession, for example:
Thus, a reliable source of good quality management information is vital.
HR systems and management information
In tandem with reward strategies being developed and articulated, there has also been a significant increase in the number of integrated HR and payroll systems being implemented across organisations. The battle to get capital sign-off for a new HR system can prove daunting for many HR directors. It’s challenging to quantify the cost versus benefit in terms of cash savings and most business cases tend to push towards significant headcount savings in payroll and HR teams through implementing the new technology. In many cases, the sophisticated HR systems, with multiple modules to cater for different aspects of HR management, need an investment in resource to ensure accurate data and management information upon which decisions can be based.
What is more difficult to put a “hard cash value saving” against is the amount of potential management information available to assist in more informed decision-making. Recruitment and retention are key examples of where quantifiable savings can be made. With recruitment costs being a large overhead for many organisations, it is often more beneficial to take steps to measure and improve employee retention and engagement. Management information on turnover, together with the identification of certain roles at risk of losing employees due to being paid below competitive levels, can assist in reducing recruitment and advertising costs.
Establishing solid foundations
With any new system, project teams will be set up and programme managers and consultants will be brought in to deliver the new technology with tight timescales and pressure to realise the projected efficiency savings as soon as possible. In some cases reward functions may be heavily involved or even manage the implementation, in others it can be delivered by payroll experts and professional project managers. This is where the first steps of the project are crucial to an effective implementation and correct set-up of the systems. Often the new systems are installed with payroll/finance priorities, with HR modules a “bolt-on” or secondary consideration. It is then too late for HR to contribute to the design of the system and old processes are replicated without any benefit to the organisation.
Where does this cross over with reward then?
Here lies the crux: with reward teams using and requiring more management information than any other part of the HR function, the system is crucial to delivering an effective reward strategy. To deliver strategic reward in line with business objectives it is essential that management information is readily available. Systems and processes that enable the strategy to be built on solid foundations need to be implemented early on in the process.
There needs to be a clear picture of the jobs, posts and people. Without this, it’s a huge challenge to both gather data and make assumptions about who does what and also how much they should and are being paid.
From local authorities to investment banks, there are a plethora of job titles, which in many cases bear limited resemblance to the actual role and responsibilities undertaken by the role holders. For example, the titles “manager” and “strategic” can be and are applied at many levels within organisations and will invariably have many different meanings.
Any reward manager when asked what the market rate is for a job has a number of considerations: What is the job? How much do we currently pay? How do I match it to the market? Depending on where the data is stored, they could end up cross-referencing multiple data sources to make a judgement on job size, internal comparators and then external market comparison.
Involving reward in vital initial stages
When scoping and implementing a new HR payroll system, workshops are often held to discuss process flows and how everything will be set up in the new system. One of the most important initial stages is the organisational structure or hierarchy (also called “position management”). The reward function can often be omitted from this part of the process, as there can be a view that this is all about cost centres, employment contracts, workflow and other transactional activities such as payroll.
This is probably the most critical point of the system set-up and configuration for any reward manager. Why? Because at this point all the different considerations concerning which job does what, sits where and what the role holders are paid, can be brought together under one process where, previously there may have been a number of spreadsheets or other systems to inform this. Often job evaluation can be the guiding hand for setting up the job and post structure.
Involving reward in creating an effective process flow from job to post/position to person, can ensure that salary reviews, market matching, retention and risk management, career development, headcount and job reporting are all properly taken into account and are available through one data source.
Whether this involves a full analytical job evaluation exercise, job families, job levelling, a market match or even in situations where there is no clearly defined reward approach, capturing the data in the organisation hierarchy is critical to increasing the efficiency of the Reward team through the reduction of spreadsheets and databases, potentially saving hundreds of person hours.
Advantages of getting it right
The benefits of getting this right include:
Having accurate information is vital to be able to deliver strategic reward and the systems and process are the foundations on which it is built.
Tips on implementation
Here are 12 tips for reward managers and job evaluation project managers during HR systems implementations:
Find out more about Andrew: http://solutions.northgatearinso.co.uk/andrew_worth
Comments